PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFD vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 49.97% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return.


AIFD

1D
-1.63%
1M
17.54%
YTD
49.97%
6M
50.25%
1Y
98.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFD vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
49.97%28.30%14.65%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and QQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024

0.90

The correlation between AIFD and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIFD vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIFD
QQQ

Technology

71.1%
53.8%

Communication Services

11.0%
15.8%

Industrials

10.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
12.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

AIFD
71.1%
QQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

AIFD
11.0%
QQQ
15.8%

Industrials

AIFD
10.2%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AIFD
6.1%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

AIFD

-

QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

AIFD

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

AIFD

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

AIFD

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

AIFD

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

AIFD

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

AIFD

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFD vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFD
AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIFDQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.89

2.64

+1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.36

3.45

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.45

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.44

3.51

+4.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.74

13.49

+22.25

AIFD vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFD Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFD and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIFDQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89

2.64

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.41

+1.18

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFDQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-82.97%

+49.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-11.96%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.26%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-32.79%

+27.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.11%

-0.34%

Volatility

AIFD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that AIFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFDQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.02%

4.49%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.84%

12.10%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.54%

15.94%

+9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.34%

22.38%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

22.29%

+7.05%

AIFD vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIFD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFD and QQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIFD has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFD dropped -33.20% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 98.66% vs 41.82% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 98.66% return vs 41.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

AIFD is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIFD and 0.18% for QQQ.

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFD and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer