AIEQ vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIEQ (Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AIEQ is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past year, AIEQ returned 19.15% vs 17.57% for TDVG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIEQ having a 8.03% return and TDVG slightly higher at 8.04%.

AIEQ

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 7.07%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIEQ Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF	8.03%	13.96%	15.21%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.04%	14.80%	12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and TDVG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.77

The correlation between AIEQ and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIEQ	TDVG
Technology	39.7%	26.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	19.3%
Communication Services	11.2%	1.0%
Industrials	10.4%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	7.2%
Healthcare	6.7%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	6.9%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.8%
Energy	2.8%	5.3%
Utilities	0.3%	3.8%
Real Estate	0.2%	1.6%

Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ

AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 56
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIEQ	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.81	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.60	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	2.44	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	10.01	-2.01

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEQ and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIEQ	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-19.20%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-7.24%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-0.82%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-3.73%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.76%	+0.64%

Volatility

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.78%. This indicates that AIEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIEQ	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	2.78%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	7.61%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	9.79%	+3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	13.92%	+5.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.47%	13.90%	+5.57%

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIEQ vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AIEQ Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF	0.40%	0.43%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIEQ and TDVG in my portfolio?

AIEQ and TDVG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIEQ or TDVG?

AIEQ has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIEQ dropped -24.19% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, AIEQ or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, AIEQ leads with 19.15% vs 17.57% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIEQ or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, AIEQ has performed better with a 19.15% return vs 17.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIEQ or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIEQ or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.40% for AIEQ.

What is the main difference between AIEQ and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIEQ and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.