PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBU vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIBU vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIBU vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a -24.90% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 87.03% return.


AIBU

1D
2.91%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
-24.90%
6M
-31.12%
1Y
36.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUSH

1D
-7.69%
1M
19.66%
YTD
87.03%
6M
61.77%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
17.99%
10Y*
-32.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIBU vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIBU vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBUGUSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.79

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.26

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.14

3.14

-1.00

AIBU vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and GUSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBUGUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.79

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.43

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and GUSH is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AIBU vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than GUSH's 1.33% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIBU
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares
2.98%2.27%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.33%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and GUSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBUGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-99.98%

+48.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

-43.67%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.21%

-99.77%

+57.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-92.81%

+79.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.73%

17.57%

+1.16%

Volatility

AIBU vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 16.69%. This indicates that AIBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIBUGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.21%

16.69%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.52%

39.24%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.05%

67.59%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.62%

68.73%

-13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.62%

94.30%

-38.68%