AIA vs. FMQQ
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and FMQQ (FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50 Index, while FMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AIA returned 32.09%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for FMQQ. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FMQQ.
Performance
AIA vs. FMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 37.37% return, which is significantly higher than FMQQ's -9.49% return.
AIA
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 22.48%
- YTD
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- 66.32%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.82%
FMQQ
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -9.49%
- 1Y
- -10.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $72.11M | $68.43M | $74.19M | |
| $165.12K | $155.48K | $92.62K |
AIA vs. FMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 37.37% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -2.94% |
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -9.49% | 10.77% | 12.45% | 15.15% | -54.03% | -16.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and FMQQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AIA and FMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIA vs. FMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIA
FMQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AIA
FMQQ
Financial Services
AIA
FMQQ
Consumer Cyclical
AIA
FMQQ
Communication Services
AIA
FMQQ
Industrials
AIA
FMQQ
Healthcare
AIA
FMQQ
-
Energy
AIA
FMQQ
-
Real Estate
AIA
FMQQ
Basic Materials
AIA
FMQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
AIA
-
FMQQ
Utilities
AIA
-
FMQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. FMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
FMQQ
AIA vs. FMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIA | FMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.92 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | -0.38 | +4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | -0.65 | +12.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIA vs. FMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, smaller than the maximum FMQQ drawdown of -64.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and FMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | FMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -64.51% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.83% | -30.82% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -30.82% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.13% | -51.07% | +39.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -49.49% | +32.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 17.93% | -12.61% |
Volatility
AIA vs. FMQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) at 4.57%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | FMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 4.57% | +6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.26% | 16.49% | +11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.64% | 19.46% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 24.65% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 24.65% | -0.48% |
AIA vs. FMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIA vs. FMQQ - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than FMQQ's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.60% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 0.68% | 0.61% | 0.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and FMQQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIA has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to FMQQ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs FMQQ's -64.51%.
On 3-year performance, AIA leads with 32.09% vs 2.86% for FMQQ. On fees, AIA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AIA has performed better with a 32.09% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.
AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.68% for FMQQ.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50 Index, while FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and EMQQ Global. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.86% for FMQQ.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIA and FMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer