PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHR vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHR achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return.


AHR

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-6.41%
1Y
38.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AHR
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
-0.47%70.03%126.69%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%25.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AHR and SCHG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHR
AHR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHRSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.51

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

5.04

+3.61

AHR vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHR and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHRSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.96

0.84

+2.12

Drawdowns

AHR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHR drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHR and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHRSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-34.59%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-16.41%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.94%

-1.78%

-10.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-5.20%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

4.90%

-0.46%

Volatility

AHR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that AHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHRSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

3.61%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

11.62%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

15.50%

+8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

22.27%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.73%

21.55%

+5.18%

Dividends

AHR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

AHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHR
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
2.15%2.12%3.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHR dropped -12.34% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

AHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHR and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer