AHMFX vs. RFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AHMFX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2) and RFM (RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, AHMFX returned 1.91%/yr vs -1.66%/yr for RFM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AHMFX charges 0.42%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for RFM.

Performance

AHMFX vs. RFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHMFX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than RFM's 7.96% return.

AHMFX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 8.64%
• 3Y*: 6.40%
• 5Y*: 1.91%
• 10Y*: 3.48%

RFM

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 3.50%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.15%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: -1.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHMFX vs. RFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	2.33%	6.03%	6.45%	7.04%	-12.44%	5.49%	9.21%
RFM RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund	7.96%	1.59%	3.24%	6.50%	-22.85%	10.85%	15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AHMFX and RFM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020	0.30

Return for Risk

AHMFX vs. RFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHMFX

AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 78
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RFM

RFM Risk / Return Rank: 25
RFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RFM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RFM Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHMFX vs. RFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHMFX	RFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	1.32	+1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.63	1.93	+2.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.25	+0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	2.13	+0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	6.66	+4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHMFX vs. RFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the RFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHMFX and RFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHMFX	RFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	1.32	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	-0.13	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.22	+1.32

Drawdowns

AHMFX vs. RFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, smaller than the maximum RFM drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHMFX and RFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHMFX	RFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-35.49%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-5.83%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.20%	-19.08%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	-35.49%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.36%	+11.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-14.73%	+12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	1.86%	-1.09%

Volatility

AHMFX vs. RFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) is 1.11%, while RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that AHMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHMFX	RFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	3.29%	-2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	7.42%	-5.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06%	9.40%	-6.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.86%	12.86%	-8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.55%	12.71%	-8.16%

AHMFX vs. RFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHMFX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than RFM's 5.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AHMFX vs. RFM - Dividend Comparison

AHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than RFM's 7.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	4.12%	5.58%	4.04%	2.97%	2.71%	3.44%	3.60%	3.68%	3.88%	4.19%	3.74%	4.19%
RFM RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund	7.51%	8.07%	7.70%	7.64%	8.38%	10.49%	5.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHMFX and RFM in my portfolio?

AHMFX and RFM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHMFX or RFM?

RFM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to AHMFX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHMFX dropped -17.65% vs RFM's -35.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.