AHMFX vs. NUAG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AHMFX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2) and NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both funds - AHMFX is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Capital Group, while NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond. AHMFX is actively managed, while NUAG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AHMFX returned 1.40%/yr vs -0.09%/yr for NUAG. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AHMFX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for NUAG.

Performance

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHMFX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than NUAG's -0.46% return.

AHMFX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -1.87%
• 6M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 1Y: 6.67%
• 3Y*: 5.66%
• 5Y*: 1.40%
• 10Y*: 3.20%
• ALL TIME*: 5.94%

NUAG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.36%
• 6M: -0.83%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 1Y: 2.31%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: -0.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	$252.59K	$179.69K	$216.95K

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	1.46%	6.03%	6.45%	7.04%	-12.44%	5.49%	4.61%	9.12%	1.80%	9.09%
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	-0.46%	7.37%	2.02%	7.52%	-13.97%	-2.03%	7.48%	10.13%	-1.45%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AHMFX and NUAG is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.45

The correlation between AHMFX and NUAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AHMFX vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHMFX

AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

NUAG

NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 32
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AHMFX	NUAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	0.84	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	1.23	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.14	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.17	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	3.04	+6.89

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the NUAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHMFX and NUAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, smaller than the maximum NUAG drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHMFX and NUAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHMFX	NUAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-19.79%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-2.54%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	-4.51%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	-19.19%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-2.17%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-4.89%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.98%	-0.19%

Volatility

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) is 0.92%, while Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that AHMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHMFX	NUAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.99%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.38%	2.81%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	3.53%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.88%	6.01%	-1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.55%	5.46%	-0.91%

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHMFX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AHMFX vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison

AHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than NUAG's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	3.81%	5.58%	4.04%	2.97%	2.71%	3.44%	3.60%	3.68%	3.88%	4.19%	3.74%	4.19%
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.16%	4.43%	4.44%	3.95%	3.60%	2.27%	2.93%	3.54%	3.79%	3.38%	0.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHMFX and NUAG in my portfolio?

AHMFX and NUAG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHMFX or NUAG?

NUAG has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to AHMFX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHMFX dropped -17.65% vs NUAG's -19.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.