PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTNX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTNX achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTNX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


MFTNX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.95%
YTD
17.73%
6M
23.66%
1Y
45.36%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
6.56%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
17.73%9.44%7.12%-13.65%58.30%2.37%-3.92%15.70%-19.56%19.38%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTNX and ASFYX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.69

The correlation between MFTNX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTNX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTNX
MFTNX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MFTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTNXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.95

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

17.88

-4.60

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTNX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTNXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.22

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.23

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.35

-0.11

Drawdowns

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTNX drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, roughly equal to the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTNX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTNXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-36.43%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-5.24%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

-30.32%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.45%

-36.43%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-36.43%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.22%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-13.18%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

1.45%

+2.02%

Volatility

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 3.67%. This indicates that MFTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTNXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

3.67%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

9.54%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

11.77%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

13.77%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

12.71%

+9.37%

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTNX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTNX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

MFTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.69%40.52%2.53%0.00%20.10%8.43%2.28%9.35%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTNX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTNX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTNX dropped -35.58% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

MFTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTNX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer