PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTNX vs. ABYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTNX achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than ABYIX's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTNX has outperformed ABYIX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while ABYIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


MFTNX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.95%
YTD
17.73%
6M
23.66%
1Y
45.36%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
6.56%

ABYIX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.93%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.03%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
17.73%9.44%7.12%-13.65%58.30%2.37%-3.92%15.70%-19.56%19.38%
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
7.88%1.62%1.11%-3.29%17.06%3.39%7.92%8.84%-6.15%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTNX and ABYIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.74

The correlation between MFTNX and ABYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTNX vs. ABYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTNX
MFTNX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MFTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ABYIX
ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTNXABYIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.08

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

2.89

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

5.61

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.28

15.20

-1.92

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ABYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTNX and ABYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTNXABYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.08

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.47

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.44

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.56

-0.32

Drawdowns

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTNX drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than ABYIX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTNX and ABYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTNXABYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-17.13%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-2.85%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

-14.00%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.45%

-14.66%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-14.74%

-20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-6.66%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

1.05%

+2.42%

Volatility

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) at 2.10%. This indicates that MFTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTNXABYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.10%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

5.91%

+6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

7.69%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

7.99%

+13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

8.02%

+14.06%

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTNX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than ABYIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTNX vs. ABYIX - Dividend Comparison

MFTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
1.23%1.33%2.10%2.03%15.24%3.68%1.54%8.70%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.24%
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.69%40.52%2.53%0.00%20.10%8.43%2.28%9.35%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTNX and ABYIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTNX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to ABYIX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTNX dropped -35.58% vs ABYIX's -17.13%.

MFTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTNX and ABYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer