AGX vs. EAT
AGX (Argan, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. AGX operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AGX returned 35.01%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for EAT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGX vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGX achieves a 105.22% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AGX has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 35.01%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.68% annualized return.
AGX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- 105.22%
- 6M
- 101.00%
- 1Y
- 190.56%
- 3Y*
- 154.34%
- 5Y*
- 71.15%
- 10Y*
- 35.01%
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 26.08%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -9.63%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
AGX vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGX Argan, Inc. | 105.22% | 130.61% | 198.31% | 30.24% | -2.01% | -11.64% | 19.15% | 8.62% | -14.32% | -34.26% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGX and EAT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.16 |
The correlation between AGX and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGX:
$9.11B
EAT:
$7.09B
AGX:
$11.38
EAT:
$10.14
AGX:
56.36
EAT:
15.71
AGX:
1.03
EAT:
0.36
AGX:
8.72
EAT:
1.27
AGX:
19.24
EAT:
17.46
AGX:
$1.04B
EAT:
$5.73B
AGX:
$217.93M
EAT:
$3.45B
AGX:
$163.99M
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGX vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
AGX
EAT
AGX vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argan, Inc. (AGX) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.00 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.68 | -0.22 | +7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.89 | -0.44 | +22.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGX vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGX drawdown since its inception was -94.37%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGX and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.37% | -88.40% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.96% | -44.41% | +19.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.75% | -45.92% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.75% | -65.54% | +21.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.61% | -84.94% | +30.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -15.77% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.33% | -24.33% | -24.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 21.77% | -12.99% |
Volatility
AGX vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
Argan, Inc. (AGX) has a higher volatility of 18.53% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 15.23%. This indicates that AGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.53% | 15.23% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.47% | 36.27% | +18.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.07% | 46.95% | +27.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.95% | 49.04% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.88% | 55.13% | -9.25% |
Dividends
AGX vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
AGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGX Argan, Inc. | 0.29% | 0.52% | 0.93% | 2.24% | 2.71% | 1.94% | 7.31% | 2.49% | 1.98% | 4.44% | 1.42% | 2.16% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
Financials
AGX vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Argan, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGX vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
AGX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.11M and revenue of 290.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
AGX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported an operating income of 45.40M and revenue of 290.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
AGX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported a net income of 46.06M and revenue of 290.95M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGX and EAT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGX has higher volatility (18.53%) compared to EAT (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGX dropped -94.37% vs EAT's -88.40%.
AGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGX and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer