AGRW vs. IUSG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AGRW is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past year, AGRW returned 12.48% vs 23.87% for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

AGRW vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRW achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 11.21% return.

AGRW

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUSG

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 9.36%
• YTD: 11.21%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 13.28%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRW vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	5.86%	23.36%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	11.21%	28.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRW and IUSG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.94

The correlation between AGRW and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AGRW vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 24
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 23

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 50
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRW vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGRW	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.40	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	1.96	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	1.83	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	7.22	-4.86

AGRW vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRW and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGRW vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRW drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRW and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGRW	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.46%	-63.41%	+46.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.46%	-13.07%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-3.48%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-21.37%	+17.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	3.31%	+1.98%

Volatility

AGRW vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is 5.39%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that AGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGRW	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	6.32%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.54%	13.99%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.73%	17.12%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	21.11%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	20.48%	+1.37%

AGRW vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGRW vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

AGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IUSG's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.12%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.49%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGRW and IUSG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, AGRW and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AGRW or IUSG?

IUSG has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to AGRW (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRW dropped -16.46% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

Which ETF is better, AGRW or IUSG?

On 1-year performance, IUSG leads with 23.87% vs 12.48% for AGRW. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, AGRW has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AGRW or IUSG?

Over the 1-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 23.87% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGRW or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGRW or IUSG?

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between AGRW and IUSG?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGRW and 0.04% for IUSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.