AGRW vs. IUSG
AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AGRW is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past year, AGRW returned 23.16% vs 33.89% for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
AGRW vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRW achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return.
AGRW
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
AGRW vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | 8.77% | 23.16% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 14.08% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRW and IUSG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AGRW and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGRW vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
AGRW
IUSG
AGRW vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGRW | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.61 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 11.09 | -6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGRW | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.17 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.38 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
AGRW vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRW drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRW and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRW | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -63.41% | +46.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -13.07% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.98% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -21.44% | +18.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.06% | +1.85% |
Volatility
AGRW vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGRW | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.23% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 12.23% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 15.72% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 20.87% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 20.40% | +1.59% |
AGRW vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGRW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGRW vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
AGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IUSG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, AGRW and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AGRW has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to IUSG (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRW dropped -16.46% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 1-year performance, IUSG leads with 33.89% vs 23.16% for AGRW. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 33.89% return vs 23.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.
They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGRW and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGRW and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer