AGRFX vs. AWF
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF).
AGRFX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990. AWF is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 28, 1993.
Performance
AGRFX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGRFX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | -12.87% | 10.84% | 31.50% | 37.95% | -29.65% | 21.40% | 35.97% | 31.11% | 3.75% | 33.88% |
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -3.52% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | -16.62% | 9.95% | 4.40% | 23.40% | -11.35% | 7.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRFX achieves a -12.87% return, which is significantly lower than AWF's -3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 14.19%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.
AGRFX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -13.78%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
AWF
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -5.90%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGRFX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGRFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGRFX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank
AGRFX
AWF
AGRFX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGRFX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 0.29 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.20 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGRFX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.41 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.31 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRFX and AWF is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGRFX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison
AGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.79%, more than AWF's 7.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | 18.79% | 16.37% | 21.03% | 7.20% | 1.69% | 9.79% | 5.79% | 7.80% | 16.01% | 9.33% | 1.03% | 9.76% |
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.73% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
Drawdowns
AGRFX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRFX drawdown since its inception was -61.88%, which is greater than AWF's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRFX and AWF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRFX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.88% | -55.54% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -10.19% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -25.25% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -40.12% | +4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.92% | -7.55% | -8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -12.35% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 3.85% | +0.43% |
Volatility
AGRFX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison
AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) at 4.56%. This indicates that AGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGRFX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 4.56% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 5.85% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.55% | 11.30% | +9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 11.98% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 15.16% | +5.23% |