PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQI achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 19.24% return.


AGQI

1D
1.09%
1M
3.24%
6M
8.33%
YTD
15.34%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.20%

FDL

1D
0.52%
1M
4.21%
6M
8.54%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$94.14K$67.18K$59.80K
$50.65M$49.05M$43.27M

AGQI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AGQI
First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF
15.34%26.67%2.98%4.43%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
19.24%14.79%17.98%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQI and FDL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.44

The correlation between AGQI and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AGQI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGQI
FDL

Technology

21.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
24.3%

Industrials

12.5%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
4.4%

Healthcare

6.7%
11.7%

Communication Services

6.1%
11.2%

Basic Materials

4.8%
0.4%

Energy

4.0%
11.1%

Utilities

2.2%
15.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

AGQI
21.6%
FDL
4.3%

Financial Services

AGQI
15.4%
FDL
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

AGQI
14.3%
FDL
24.3%

Industrials

AGQI
12.5%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AGQI
12.3%
FDL
4.4%

Healthcare

AGQI
6.7%
FDL
11.7%

Communication Services

AGQI
6.1%
FDL
11.2%

Basic Materials

AGQI
4.8%
FDL
0.4%

Energy

AGQI
4.0%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

AGQI
2.2%
FDL
15.4%

Real Estate

AGQI

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGQI
AGQI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AGQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGQI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGQIFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

6.63

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

15.64

-6.40

AGQI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGQI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQI drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-65.93%

+51.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-4.27%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.07%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-9.59%

+7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.81%

+0.78%

Volatility

AGQI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI) is 3.75%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that AGQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.55%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

8.76%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

11.87%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

14.43%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

17.16%

-4.49%

AGQI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

AGQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than FDL's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGQI
First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF
1.66%2.54%2.14%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.56%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQI and FDL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to AGQI (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQI dropped -14.07% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, FDL leads with 28.21% vs 23.90% for AGQI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, AGQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDL has performed better with a 28.21% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AGQI.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.66% for AGQI.

AGQI is categorized as Quality Factor, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for AGQI and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer