PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQ vs. JNUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQ vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -56.47% return, which is significantly lower than JNUG's -38.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has outperformed JNUG with an annualized return of 2.74%, while JNUG has yielded a comparatively lower -30.93% annualized return.


AGQ

1D
5.20%
1M
-6.10%
6M
-59.38%
YTD
-56.47%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
2.74%
ALL TIME*
2.22%

JNUG

1D
6.33%
1M
-4.53%
6M
-50.34%
YTD
-38.27%
1Y
64.47%
3Y*
61.18%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
-30.93%
ALL TIME*
-35.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$130.55M$131.30M$272.55M
$34.34M$36.16M$44.65M

AGQ vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-56.47%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-22.10%5.49%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-38.27%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and JNUG is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.72

The correlation between AGQ and JNUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQ vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGQ vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGQJNUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.92

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

1.77

-1.11

AGQ vs. JNUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the JNUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and JNUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and JNUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQJNUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-99.95%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.13%

-70.58%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.13%

-70.58%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.13%

-76.67%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.13%

-99.66%

+14.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.76%

-99.66%

+8.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.94%

-93.94%

+14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.96%

36.46%

+15.50%

Volatility

AGQ vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) is 22.46%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a volatility of 29.32%. This indicates that AGQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQJNUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.46%

29.32%

-6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.17%

85.31%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

125.56%

107.50%

+18.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.32%

82.50%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.42%

105.75%

-39.33%

AGQ vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQ vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison

AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.31%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQ and JNUG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.32%) compared to AGQ (22.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs JNUG's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 2.74% vs -30.93% for JNUG. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, AGQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 2.74% return vs -30.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.

AGQ is categorized as Silver, while JNUG is Gold. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 1.03% for JNUG.

JNUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQ and JNUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer