AGOX vs. RBIL
AGOX (Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGOX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Adaptive Funds, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. AGOX is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, AGOX returned 26.89% vs 4.60% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. AGOX charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
AGOX vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGOX achieves a 21.85% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.
AGOX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGOX vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | 21.85% | 7.67% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.67% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGOX and RBIL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGOX vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
AGOX
RBIL
AGOX vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGOX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.41 | -1.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 17.11 | -15.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 71.11 | -64.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGOX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 5.06 | -3.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 4.24 | -3.73 |
Drawdowns
AGOX vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGOX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOX and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGOX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -0.50% | -26.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.32% | -0.27% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.03% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -0.06% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 0.06% | +4.13% |
Volatility
AGOX vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that AGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGOX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 0.30% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 0.79% | +15.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 0.92% | +17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 1.05% | +18.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 1.05% | +18.62% |
AGOX vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGOX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGOX vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
AGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | 2.65% | 3.23% | 3.94% | 0.27% | 0.20% | 6.36% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGOX and RBIL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGOX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGOX dropped -26.93% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, AGOX leads with 26.89% vs 4.60% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGOX has performed better with a 26.89% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for AGOX.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.65% for AGOX.
AGOX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive Funds and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for AGOX and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGOX and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer