PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGOX vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGOX vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGOX vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
-6.79%8.58%15.97%19.07%-11.56%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
2.96%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGOX achieves a -6.79% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 2.96% return.


AGOX

1D
3.30%
1M
-9.05%
YTD
-6.79%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
12.34%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
10Y*

CLSE

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
2.96%
6M
9.11%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGOX vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGOX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGOX vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGOX
AGOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGOX vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGOXCLSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

2.19

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

2.84

-1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.40

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

4.14

-3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.15

19.56

-16.41

AGOX vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGOX and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGOXCLSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.19

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.25

-1.01

Correlation

The correlation between AGOX and CLSE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AGOX vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

AGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
3.46%3.23%3.94%0.27%0.20%6.36%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%

Drawdowns

AGOX vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGOX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOX and CLSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGOXCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-16.45%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.32%

-7.88%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.52%

-2.53%

-9.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-3.73%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

1.67%

+2.49%

Volatility

AGOX vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 5.68%. This indicates that AGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGOXCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

5.68%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

10.35%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

14.47%

+7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

13.85%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

13.85%

+5.41%