PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGOX vs. AOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGOX vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGOX vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
-5.64%8.58%15.97%19.07%-19.21%9.82%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
-0.59%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%6.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGOX achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's -0.59% return.


AGOX

1D
1.24%
1M
-7.61%
YTD
-5.64%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
10Y*

AOA

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.92%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGOX vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGOX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGOX vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGOX
AGOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGOX vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGOXAOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.35

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

1.97

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.98

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.26

8.82

-5.57

AGOX vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGOX and AOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGOXAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.35

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.65

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between AGOX and AOA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AGOX vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

AGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
3.42%3.23%3.94%0.27%0.20%6.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.19%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%

Drawdowns

AGOX vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGOX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOX and AOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGOXAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-28.38%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.32%

-9.62%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-5.18%

-6.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-4.08%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

2.16%

+2.06%

Volatility

AGOX vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 5.28%. This indicates that AGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGOXAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

5.28%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

8.34%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

13.87%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

12.92%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

13.51%

+5.75%