AGMI vs. GSIB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGMI is a Silver fund tracking the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. AGMI is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, AGMI returned 67.20% vs 45.11% for GSIB. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

AGMI vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 18.96% return.

AGMI

• 1D: -4.03%
• 1M: -18.49%
• 6M: -22.58%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 1Y: 67.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSIB

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 2.63%
• 6M: 15.32%
• YTD: 18.96%
• 1Y: 45.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGMI vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	-10.86%	176.11%	-0.74%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	18.96%	61.67%	18.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and GSIB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024	0.40

AGMI vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGMI	GSIB
Basic Materials	99.8%	-
Technology	0.0%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.0%	99.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AGMI vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGMI

AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 41
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 86
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGMI vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGMI	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.59	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.59	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	3.26	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	11.42	-7.21

AGMI vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGMI	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.67%	-17.71%	-17.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.67%	-13.90%	-21.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.67%	-1.27%	-34.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.23%	-2.01%	-8.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.00%	3.96%	+12.04%

Volatility

AGMI vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.36%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGMI	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	4.36%	+8.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.53%	14.58%	+28.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.40%	17.52%	+34.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.97%	18.39%	+26.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.97%	18.39%	+26.58%

AGMI vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGMI and GSIB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

AGMI vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than GSIB's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	4.97%	4.43%	1.81%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.60%	1.91%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGMI and GSIB in my portfolio?

AGMI and GSIB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGMI or GSIB?

AGMI has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to GSIB (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGMI dropped -35.67% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, AGMI or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 67.20% vs 45.11% for GSIB. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AGMI or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 67.20% return vs 45.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGMI or GSIB?

AGMI and GSIB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGMI or GSIB?

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.60% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between AGMI and GSIB?

AGMI is categorized as Silver, while GSIB is Financials Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.