PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGI vs. HL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGI vs. HL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGI achieves a -23.48% return, which is significantly lower than HL's -17.53% return. Over the past 10 years, AGI has outperformed HL with an annualized return of 12.40%, while HL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.98% annualized return.


AGI

1D
-1.41%
1M
-14.58%
6M
-29.40%
YTD
-23.48%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
35.85%
5Y*
31.49%
10Y*
12.40%

HL

1D
0.19%
1M
5.54%
6M
-29.50%
YTD
-17.53%
1Y
150.61%
3Y*
44.14%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGI vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
-23.48%109.93%37.72%34.33%33.11%-11.00%46.75%68.42%-44.49%-4.57%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-17.53%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AGI and HL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2003

0.54

The correlation between AGI and HL shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGI:

$12.37B

HL:

$10.61B

EPS

AGI:

$2.52

HL:

$0.83

PE Ratio

AGI:

11.71

HL:

19.05

PEG Ratio

AGI:

0.08

HL:

0.08

PS Ratio

AGI:

6.02

HL:

6.77

PB Ratio

AGI:

2.69

HL:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGI:

$2.07B

HL:

$1.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGI:

$1.22B

HL:

$788.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

AGI:

$1.43B

HL:

$864.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGI vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGI
AGI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGI vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGIHLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

3.05

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

6.03

-5.29

AGI vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGI Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGI and HL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGI vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGI drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI and HL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGIHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.13%

-97.92%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.06%

-55.81%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.06%

-55.81%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.06%

-55.81%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.05%

-82.45%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.65%

-50.25%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.74%

-69.90%

+32.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.85%

28.11%

-10.26%

Volatility

AGI vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) has a higher volatility of 19.40% compared to Hecla Mining Company (HL) at 17.79%. This indicates that AGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGIHLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.40%

17.79%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

53.33%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.69%

73.28%

-19.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.82%

59.43%

-17.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.53%

62.82%

-14.29%

Dividends

AGI vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than HL's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
0.44%0.26%0.54%0.74%0.99%1.30%0.74%0.66%0.56%0.31%0.29%1.22%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.09%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Financials

AGI vs. HL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
588.43M
411.43M
(AGI) Total Revenue
(HL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGI vs. HL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alamos Gold Inc. and Hecla Mining Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
63.9%
61.6%
Portfolio components
AGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.02M and revenue of 588.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.

HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

AGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 337.66M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

AGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.75M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGI and HL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGI has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to HL (17.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGI dropped -88.13% vs HL's -97.92%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGI and HL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer