AGI vs. GFI
AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, AGI returned 17.27%/yr vs 27.45%/yr for GFI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AGI vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGI achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AGI has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 17.27%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.45% annualized return.
AGI
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 42.45%
- 5Y*
- 33.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
AGI vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.58% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGI and GFI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AGI and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGI:
$14.85B
GFI:
$32.65B
AGI:
$2.52
GFI:
$5.39
AGI:
13.99
GFI:
6.78
AGI:
0.09
GFI:
0.11
AGI:
7.19
GFI:
2.34
AGI:
3.21
GFI:
3.87
AGI:
$2.07B
GFI:
$13.98B
AGI:
$1.22B
GFI:
$7.34B
AGI:
$1.43B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGI vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
AGI
GFI
AGI vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGI | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.15 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 3.06 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGI vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGI drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGI | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.13% | -88.05% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.29% | -43.90% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.29% | -43.90% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.29% | -56.22% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.13% | -63.09% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.25% | -38.93% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.73% | -44.25% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.05% | 16.51% | -2.46% |
Volatility
AGI vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 17.80% and 17.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGI | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 17.70% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.01% | 46.40% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.64% | 59.94% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 52.37% | -10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 54.90% | -6.46% |
Dividends
AGI vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
AGI vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGI vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.02M and revenue of 588.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 337.66M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.75M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGI and GFI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGI has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to GFI (17.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGI dropped -88.13% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGI and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer