AGI vs. EZPW
AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) and EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) are both stocks. AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, AGI returned 12.25%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for EZPW. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AGI vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGI achieves a -27.72% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 53.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGI having a 12.25% annualized return and EZPW not far ahead at 12.60%.
AGI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- -24.43%
- YTD
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- 6M
- 38.79%
- YTD
- 53.30%
- 1Y
- 107.89%
- 3Y*
- 48.72%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.64M | $126.71M | $144.32M | |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | $23.79M | $29.04M | $30.38M |
AGI vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -27.72% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 53.30% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGI and EZPW is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2003 | 0.08 |
The correlation between AGI and EZPW shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGI:
$11.69B
EZPW:
$1.74B
AGI:
$2.76
EZPW:
$1.76
AGI:
10.07
EZPW:
16.91
AGI:
0.07
EZPW:
0.11
AGI:
5.32
EZPW:
1.68
AGI:
2.44
EZPW:
2.22
AGI:
$2.21B
EZPW:
$1.48B
AGI:
$1.33B
EZPW:
$865.21M
AGI:
$1.75B
EZPW:
$256.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGI vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank
AGI
EZPW
AGI vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGI | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.45 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 5.91 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 19.70 | -18.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGI vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGI drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI and EZPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGI | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.13% | -97.28% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.60% | -18.35% | -31.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.60% | -20.51% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.60% | -35.94% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.81% | -76.59% | +8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.60% | -21.80% | -27.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.77% | -58.93% | +21.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.26% | 5.50% | +15.76% |
Volatility
AGI vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) is 11.71%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that AGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGI | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.71% | 15.87% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.49% | 31.30% | +13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.01% | 38.42% | +15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 34.66% | +7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 39.06% | +9.37% |
Dividends
AGI vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison
AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.47% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AGI vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGI vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGI and EZPW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGI dropped -88.13% vs EZPW's -97.28%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGI and EZPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer