AGGH vs. TUA
AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) and TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGGH returned 4.99%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for TUA. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGGH charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TUA.
Performance
AGGH vs. TUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -5.24% return.
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- 1Y
- -1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.70% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | 1.71% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -5.24% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGH and TUA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AGGH and TUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGH vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank
AGGH
TUA
AGGH vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGGH | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.95 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | -0.32 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | -0.81 | +8.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGGH vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum TUA drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and TUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGH | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -15.85% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -7.05% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.67% | -9.14% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -9.92% | +8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -8.37% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.74% | -1.65% |
Volatility
AGGH vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) is 1.67%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that AGGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGH | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 2.35% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 5.00% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 6.84% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 10.75% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 10.75% | -2.31% |
AGGH vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGGH vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison
AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than TUA's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.51% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.55% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGH and TUA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to AGGH (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGH dropped -13.26% vs TUA's -15.85%.
On 3-year performance, AGGH leads with 4.99% vs -0.12% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, AGGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGGH has performed better with a 4.99% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 3.55% for TUA.
Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AGGH and 0.16% for TUA.
AGGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGGH and TUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer