AGG vs. MDT
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while MDT (Medtronic plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.42%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for MDT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AGG vs. MDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed MDT with an annualized return of 1.42%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.06%
MDT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- 6M
- -12.44%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- 1.10%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
AGG vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.03% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
MDT Medtronic plc | -11.80% | 24.05% | 0.28% | 9.58% | -22.55% | -9.79% | 5.70% | 27.34% | 15.18% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and MDT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2003 | -0.04 |
The correlation between AGG and MDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
MDT
AGG vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGG | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.14 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | -0.30 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGG vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum MDT drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and MDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -57.63% | +39.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -28.90% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.71% | -28.90% | +23.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -45.10% | +27.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -45.10% | +26.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -27.93% | +25.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -16.57% | +13.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 13.24% | -12.23% |
Volatility
AGG vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.12%, while Medtronic plc (MDT) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 10.04% | -8.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 18.91% | -15.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 23.34% | -19.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 22.34% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 23.45% | -18.04% |
Dividends
AGG vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than MDT's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.02% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.42% | 2.95% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and MDT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDT has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to AGG (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs MDT's -57.63%.
AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGG and MDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer