PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGG vs. LEGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGG vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 11.18% return.


AGG

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.57%

LEGR

1D
0.92%
1M
4.00%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.29%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGG vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.52%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%1.06%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.18%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%17.91%18.73%27.99%-14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AGG and LEGR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018

0.07

Over the past year, AGG and LEGR have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGG vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGG vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGGLEGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.64

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

9.72

-4.90

AGG vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGG and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGG vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum LEGR drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and LEGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGLEGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-36.12%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-10.40%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-14.25%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-31.45%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-2.56%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.60%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.82%

-1.88%

Volatility

AGG vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.37%, while First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGLEGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

5.87%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

12.07%

-9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

14.34%

-10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

17.07%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

20.33%

-14.92%

AGG vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGG vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than LEGR's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.68%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGG and LEGR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEGR has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to AGG (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.61% vs 0.06% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.68% for LEGR.

AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while LEGR is Blockchain. AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGG and LEGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer