AGEM vs. QAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT).

AGEM and QAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGEM is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. QAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.

Performance

AGEM vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGEM vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	6.11%	29.81%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	-1.16%	8.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -1.16% return.

AGEM

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: -9.42%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 42.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -3.61%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 3.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGEM vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

AGEM

abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF

QAT

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

Return for Risk

AGEM vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGEM

AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 31
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGEM vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGEM	QAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	0.62	+1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	0.86	+1.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.13	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	0.82	+2.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	1.80	+10.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGEM vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGEM and QAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGEM	QAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	0.62	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	0.07	+1.58

Correlation

The correlation between AGEM and QAT is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AGEM vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than QAT's 3.55% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	2.12%	1.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	3.55%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Drawdowns

AGEM vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and QAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGEM	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-45.21%	+29.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.92%	-10.60%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.97%	-13.45%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-19.29%	+17.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	4.81%	-1.33%

Volatility

AGEM vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.05%. This indicates that AGEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGEM	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.85%	5.05%	+5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	9.07%	+5.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.74%	13.22%	+7.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.36%	14.84%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.36%	17.60%	+2.76%