AFTY vs. MCHS
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS).
AFTY and MCHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. MCHS is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024.
Performance
AFTY vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFTY vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.41% |
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | 10.80% | 31.19% | 6.53% |
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCHS
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 32.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFTY vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
MCHS
AFTY vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | MCHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.79 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and MCHS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AFTY vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | 3.22% | 3.56% | 5.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | MCHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -11.50% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.98% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | MCHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 25.64% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 27.86% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 27.86% | — |