AFRU vs. TSLZ
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFRU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -29.47% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 11.42% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 15.96%
- YTD
- -29.47%
- 6M
- -32.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 11.56%
- 1M
- 18.35%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- -51.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -29.47% | -38.81% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 11.42% | -30.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and TSLZ is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLZ
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -99.11% | +14.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.79% | -98.83% | +38.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -75.70% | +19.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 57.22% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.31% | 88.07% | +35.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.31% | 116.88% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.31% | 116.88% | +6.43% |
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.62% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
AFRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer