AFRU vs. TSLG
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
AFRU vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -20.82% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -38.11%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- -20.82%
- 6M
- -21.35%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -38.11% | -42.30% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.82% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and TSLG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
TSLG
AFRU vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFRU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.34 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -82.86% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.60% | -60.00% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -58.73% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.63% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 121.30% | 92.53% | +28.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 115.31% | +5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 115.31% | +5.99% |
AFRU vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 8.27% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and TSLG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 0.75% for TSLG.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer