AFRU vs. MULL
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
AFRU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -38.11%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -38.11% | -42.30% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 171.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
MULL
AFRU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFRU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 46.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 7.45 | -8.08 |
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -72.29% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.60% | 0.00% | -65.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -20.62% | -35.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 121.30% | 132.38% | -11.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 136.22% | -14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 136.22% | -14.92% |
AFRU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AFRU and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
AFRU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFRU and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer