PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.


AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
2.92%
1M
216.81%
YTD
936.86%
6M
1,369.93%
1Y
6,074.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.30%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
936.86%171.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFRU

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFRU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFRUMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

7.45

-8.08

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-72.29%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.60%

0.00%

-65.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.01%

-20.62%

-35.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

Volatility

AFRU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.30%

132.38%

-11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.30%

136.22%

-14.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.30%

136.22%

-14.92%

AFRU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AFRU and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

AFRU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFRU and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer