AFRU vs. MSTU
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.
Performance
AFRU vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -76.29% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- 15.68%
- 1M
- 34.14%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -22.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- -18.60%
- 1M
- -68.43%
- YTD
- -76.29%
- 6M
- -78.47%
- 1Y
- -97.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -18.41% | -38.81% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -76.29% | -83.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and MSTU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTU
AFRU vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -99.23% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -98.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.65% | -99.23% | +44.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -72.63% | +16.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 78.54% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 46.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 115.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.30% | 143.10% | -18.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 168.93% | -44.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 168.93% | -44.63% |
AFRU vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRU nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and MSTU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
AFRU and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for MSTU.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer