AFRU vs. COIG
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
AFRU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -69.26% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- 15.68%
- 1M
- 34.14%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -22.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- -37.69%
- YTD
- -69.26%
- 6M
- -72.75%
- 1Y
- -90.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -18.41% | -38.81% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -69.26% | -59.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and COIG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COIG
AFRU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -93.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -93.09% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -93.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.65% | -93.09% | +38.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -53.30% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 69.34% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 102.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.30% | 135.90% | -11.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 145.27% | -20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 145.27% | -20.97% |
AFRU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRU nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and COIG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
AFRU and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 0.75% for COIG.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer