AFOS vs. FDT
AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AFOS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by ARS Investment Partners, while FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFOS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
AFOS vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 24.89% return.
AFOS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 36.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 24.89%
- 6M
- 27.78%
- 1Y
- 53.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
AFOS vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.24% | 36.15% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 24.89% | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFOS and FDT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFOS vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
AFOS
FDT
AFOS vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFOS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.35 | 0.39 | +3.95 |
Drawdowns
AFOS vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFOS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -46.10% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -2.07% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -10.77% | +9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility
AFOS vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFOS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.14% | 18.42% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 18.23% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 18.52% | +1.62% |
AFOS vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFOS vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FDT's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.85% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFOS and FDT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
AFOS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.80% for FDT.
Find the right allocation for AFOS and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer