PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 24.89% return.


AFOS

1D
0.15%
1M
7.26%
YTD
32.24%
6M
36.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDT

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.67%
YTD
24.89%
6M
27.78%
1Y
53.72%
3Y*
29.96%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and FDT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

0.39

+3.95

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-46.10%

+34.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.07%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-10.77%

+9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

Volatility

AFOS vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

18.42%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

18.23%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

18.52%

+1.62%

AFOS vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FDT's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.85%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and FDT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

AFOS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.80% for FDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer