PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.09%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and DFND is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

0.36

+3.99

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and DFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-22.65%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-3.69%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-5.70%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

Volatility

AFOS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

10.92%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

22.46%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

19.09%

+1.10%

AFOS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DFND's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and DFND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 1.50% for DFND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and DFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer