AFMC vs. REGL
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL).
AFMC and REGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFMC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. REGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015.
Performance
AFMC vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFMC vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 3.16% | 10.23% | 19.06% | 21.46% | -15.55% | 25.75% | 5.87% | 2.56% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.22% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 2.54% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFMC having a 3.16% return and REGL slightly higher at 3.22%.
AFMC
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
REGL
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFMC vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFMC vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
AFMC
REGL
AFMC vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMC | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.60 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 0.97 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.94 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | 3.29 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMC | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.60 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.43 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMC and REGL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFMC vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than REGL's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.87% | 1.42% | 0.84% | 1.05% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.25% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
AFMC vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and REGL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMC | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.14% | -36.37% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -10.94% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -16.96% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -6.51% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -4.09% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.11% | -0.06% |
Volatility
AFMC vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 4.35%. This indicates that AFMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFMC | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.35% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 9.21% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 16.27% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 16.11% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 18.31% | +4.80% |