PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFLG vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFLG vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AFLG having a 12.78% return and RFDA slightly lower at 12.65%.


AFLG

1D
0.36%
1M
3.43%
YTD
12.78%
6M
12.48%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*

RFDA

1D
1.12%
1M
4.60%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.45%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFLG vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
12.78%14.23%27.02%20.10%-16.41%27.29%10.31%2.77%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
12.65%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AFLG and RFDA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019

0.91

The correlation between AFLG and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

AFLG vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFLG
RFDA

Technology

33.6%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
7.0%

Communication Services

10.1%
8.8%

Financial Services

10.0%
14.7%

Industrials

9.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.6%

Utilities

4.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.8%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Energy

3.2%
12.5%

Technology

AFLG
33.6%
RFDA
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AFLG
10.2%
RFDA
7.0%

Communication Services

AFLG
10.1%
RFDA
8.8%

Financial Services

AFLG
10.0%
RFDA
14.7%

Industrials

AFLG
9.4%
RFDA
8.9%

Healthcare

AFLG
7.8%
RFDA
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

AFLG
4.2%
RFDA
7.6%

Utilities

AFLG
4.1%
RFDA
5.0%

Real Estate

AFLG
3.8%
RFDA
5.0%

Basic Materials

AFLG
3.6%
RFDA
1.8%

Energy

AFLG
3.2%
RFDA
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFLG vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFLG
AFLG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFLG vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFLGRFDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

5.79

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

21.14

-6.71

AFLG vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLG and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFLGRFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.70

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.86

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.80

-0.06

Drawdowns

AFLG vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFLGRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-34.60%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-5.45%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-19.35%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-19.35%

-4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.74%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.49%

+0.29%

Volatility

AFLG vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFLGRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.75%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

8.53%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

11.67%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

15.74%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

16.85%

+2.34%

AFLG vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFLG vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than RFDA's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
0.70%0.84%0.53%1.53%1.52%0.93%1.28%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.75%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFLG and RFDA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFLG has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to RFDA (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.42% vs 12.99% for AFLG. On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AFLG.

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.70% for AFLG.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFLG and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer