AFLG vs. MFUS
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - AFLG tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
AFLG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
AFLG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and MFUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between AFLG and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
MFUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
AFLG
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
MFUS
Communication Services
AFLG
MFUS
Financial Services
AFLG
MFUS
Industrials
AFLG
MFUS
Healthcare
AFLG
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
MFUS
Utilities
AFLG
MFUS
Real Estate
AFLG
MFUS
Basic Materials
AFLG
MFUS
Energy
AFLG
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
MFUS
AFLG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 4.41 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 18.13 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.63 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -35.21% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -6.39% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -15.39% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -18.22% | -5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -4.00% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.55% | +0.23% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 2.86%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.22% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 10.72% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 15.03% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 17.35% | +1.85% |
AFLG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to AFLG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, AFLG leads with 12.91% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AFLG.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.70% for AFLG.
AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer