BDGS vs. PRAY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY).

BDGS and PRAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023. PRAY is a passively managed fund by Faith Investor Services that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Feb 7, 2022.

Performance

BDGS vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BDGS vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	2.94%	9.08%	13.02%	14.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than PRAY's 2.94% return.

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRAY

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDGS vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

PRAY

FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF

Return for Risk

BDGS vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 48
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDGS vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDGS	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.84	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.34	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.18	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.17	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.34	5.43	+3.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDGS vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDGS and PRAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDGS	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.84	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.43	+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and PRAY is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BDGS vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than PRAY's 0.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.67%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum PRAY drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and PRAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDGS	PRAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-21.40%	+12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.85%	-11.45%	+5.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-5.97%	+3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-5.61%	+4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	2.47%	-1.34%

Volatility

BDGS vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) is 3.39%, while FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that BDGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDGS	PRAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	6.29%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	9.78%	-4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	16.78%	-6.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.35%	16.03%	-7.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.35%	16.03%	-7.68%