PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFK vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFK vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.


AFK

1D
-2.60%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.79%
6M
9.04%
1Y
40.92%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
5.47%

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFK vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
0.79%74.71%12.10%-12.11%-17.31%3.00%4.26%9.90%-12.59%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AFK and FID is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.55

The correlation between AFK and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

AFK vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFK
FID

Financial Services

37.7%
20.8%

Basic Materials

32.5%
4.3%

Communication Services

12.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
4.0%

Energy

4.7%
8.0%

Industrials

3.7%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

0.5%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
9.4%

Utilities

0.2%
17.4%

Technology

-

4.1%

Financial Services

AFK
37.7%
FID
20.8%

Basic Materials

AFK
32.5%
FID
4.3%

Communication Services

AFK
12.5%
FID
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AFK
6.5%
FID
4.0%

Energy

AFK
4.7%
FID
8.0%

Industrials

AFK
3.7%
FID
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

AFK
1.6%
FID
3.7%

Healthcare

AFK
0.5%
FID
3.5%

Real Estate

AFK
0.2%
FID
9.4%

Utilities

AFK
0.2%
FID
17.4%

Technology

AFK

-

FID
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFK vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFK
AFK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFK vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFKFIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.30

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

3.26

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.62

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.32

9.14

-2.83

AFK vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFK and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFKFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.30

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.46

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.39

-0.39

Drawdowns

AFK vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFKFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-39.79%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-8.93%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-10.97%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-29.13%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.78%

-1.11%

-10.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-8.47%

-23.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

2.55%

+3.95%

Volatility

AFK vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFKFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

3.00%

+5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

8.12%

+14.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

10.16%

+15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

17.04%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

18.96%

+3.21%

AFK vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFK vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
1.01%1.02%0.00%2.27%3.59%4.17%3.91%6.34%1.71%1.99%2.67%2.16%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFK and FID have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFK has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 5.59% for AFK. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.01% for AFK.

AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.60% for FID.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFK and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer