AFK vs. DEM
AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AFK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AFK returned 5.25%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for DEM. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AFK charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
AFK vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 17.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed DEM with an annualized return of 5.25%, while DEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.
AFK
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.03%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.06M | $2.15M | $2.08M | |
| $8.90M | $9.48M | $10.87M |
AFK vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | -2.32% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 4.26% | 9.90% | -19.55% | 28.22% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.08% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 26.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and DEM is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2008 | 0.65 |
The correlation between AFK and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFK vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFK
DEM
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
-
Basic Materials
AFK
DEM
Financial Services
AFK
DEM
Communication Services
AFK
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
AFK
DEM
Energy
AFK
DEM
Industrials
AFK
DEM
Consumer Defensive
AFK
DEM
Healthcare
AFK
DEM
Real Estate
AFK
DEM
Utilities
AFK
DEM
Technology
AFK
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFK vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
AFK
DEM
AFK vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFK | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.15 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 9.50 | -6.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFK vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than DEM's maximum drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFK | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -51.85% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -7.89% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -15.64% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.62% | -27.18% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.33% | -37.79% | -15.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.50% | -3.57% | -10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -12.82% | -19.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 2.61% | +6.13% |
Volatility
AFK vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.12%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFK | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 5.12% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | 13.28% | +9.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.08% | 15.02% | +12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 15.60% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 17.85% | +4.29% |
AFK vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFK vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than DEM's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.18% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFK and DEM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFK has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to DEM (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 10-year performance, DEM leads with 9.26% vs 5.25% for AFK. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.04% for AFK.
AFK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFK and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer