AFK vs. BKIE
AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - AFK tracks the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFK returned 6.45%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for BKIE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFK charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
AFK vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 9.43% return.
AFK
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
AFK vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 3.48% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 46.39% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.43% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and BKIE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AFK and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFK vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFK
BKIE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
-
Financial Services
AFK
BKIE
Basic Materials
AFK
BKIE
Communication Services
AFK
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
AFK
BKIE
Energy
AFK
BKIE
Industrials
AFK
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
AFK
BKIE
Healthcare
AFK
BKIE
Real Estate
AFK
BKIE
Utilities
AFK
BKIE
Technology
AFK
-
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFK vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
AFK
BKIE
AFK vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFK | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.59 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.26 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.12 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 8.19 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFK | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.59 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.59 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.93 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
AFK vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFK | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -28.19% | -34.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -11.41% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -13.19% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -28.19% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -0.45% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -4.98% | -27.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 2.95% | +3.50% |
Volatility
AFK vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.53%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFK | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 4.53% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 12.14% | +10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 14.57% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 16.12% | +5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 16.34% | +5.82% |
AFK vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFK vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than BKIE's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.98% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFK and BKIE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFK has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to BKIE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.43% vs 6.45% for AFK. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.98% for AFK.
AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.04% for BKIE.
AFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFK and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer