PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFK vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFK vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 10.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 5.69%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.62% annualized return.


AFK

1D
-2.39%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
-2.24%
6M
-2.61%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
5.69%

ARKQ

1D
-2.83%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
10.20%
6M
5.80%
1Y
49.50%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
21.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFK vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
-2.24%74.71%12.10%-12.11%-17.31%3.00%4.26%9.90%-19.55%28.22%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
10.20%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AFK and ARKQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.47

The correlation between AFK and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

AFK vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFK
ARKQ

Financial Services

37.1%

-

Basic Materials

34.1%

-

Communication Services

12.5%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
14.3%

Energy

4.3%
1.6%

Industrials

3.4%
39.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%
1.0%

Technology

-

33.4%

Financial Services

AFK
37.1%
ARKQ

-

Basic Materials

AFK
34.1%
ARKQ

-

Communication Services

AFK
12.5%
ARKQ
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AFK
6.3%
ARKQ
14.3%

Energy

AFK
4.3%
ARKQ
1.6%

Industrials

AFK
3.4%
ARKQ
39.3%

Consumer Defensive

AFK
1.5%
ARKQ

-

Healthcare

AFK
0.5%
ARKQ
1.2%

Real Estate

AFK
0.2%
ARKQ

-

Utilities

AFK
0.1%
ARKQ
1.0%

Technology

AFK

-

ARKQ
33.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFK vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFK
AFK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFK vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFKARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.42

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

6.99

-1.98

AFK vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFK and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFK vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFKARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-59.89%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-20.58%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-30.76%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.62%

-55.71%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.33%

-59.89%

+6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.43%

-12.14%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-17.20%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.09%

7.10%

-0.01%

Volatility

AFK vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) is 9.46%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that AFK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFKARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

12.96%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.76%

26.26%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

33.93%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

32.60%

-10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

30.01%

-7.82%

AFK vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFK vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than ARKQ's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
1.04%1.02%0.00%2.27%3.59%4.17%3.91%6.34%1.71%1.99%2.67%2.16%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFK and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to AFK (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 21.62% vs 5.69% for AFK. On fees, ARKQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AFK has been the lower-risk option at 9.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 21.62% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.

AFK has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.24% for ARKQ.

AFK is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.75% for ARKQ.

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFK and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer