PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. SCCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. SCCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFIX having a 0.31% return and SCCR slightly higher at 0.32%.


AFIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCCR

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.35%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. SCCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.31%6.24%
SCCR
Schwab Core Bond ETF
0.32%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and SCCR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.93

The correlation between AFIX and SCCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. SCCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCR
SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. SCCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFIXSCCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.18

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

6.58

-0.91

AFIX vs. SCCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SCCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and SCCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFIXSCCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.63

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.20

-0.31

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. SCCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, which is greater than SCCR's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and SCCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXSCCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-2.81%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.81%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.56%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.76%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.93%

+0.07%

Volatility

AFIX vs. SCCR - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) at 1.28%. This indicates that AFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXSCCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.28%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.70%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.75%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

4.38%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

4.38%

+0.17%

AFIX vs. SCCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCCR's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AFIX vs. SCCR - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than SCCR's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.02%4.94%0.38%
SCCR
Schwab Core Bond ETF
4.63%3.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AFIX and SCCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SCCR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs SCCR's -2.81%.

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 6.10% vs 5.65% for AFIX. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.63% for SCCR.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.16% for SCCR.

SCCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and SCCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer