AFIX vs. BNO
AFIX (Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AFIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Allspring, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. AFIX is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, AFIX returned 5.82% vs 89.50% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. AFIX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
AFIX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.
AFIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- 86.76%
- 6M
- 83.45%
- 1Y
- 89.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 23.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
AFIX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF | 0.53% | 7.52% | -1.67% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 86.76% | -5.44% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFIX and BNO is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFIX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
AFIX
BNO
AFIX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFIX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.68 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 5.39 | -3.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 10.23 | -4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFIX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.14 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
AFIX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFIX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -87.06% | +83.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -17.87% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -12.04% | +10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -40.18% | +39.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 9.43% | -8.44% |
Volatility
AFIX vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) is 1.47%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that AFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFIX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 15.03% | -13.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 36.08% | -33.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 41.56% | -37.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 35.37% | -30.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 36.68% | -32.13% |
AFIX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFIX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF | 5.01% | 4.94% | 0.38% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFIX and BNO have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to AFIX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 89.50% vs 5.82% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AFIX has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 89.50% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
AFIX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFIX and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer