AEVA vs. LAES

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AEVA (Aeva Technologies, Inc.) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. AEVA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, AEVA returned 53.85%/yr vs -30.34%/yr for LAES. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AEVA vs. LAES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEVA achieves a 83.73% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -3.44% return.

AEVA

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: 60.10%
• YTD: 83.73%
• 6M: 53.65%
• 1Y: 18.85%
• 3Y*: 53.85%
• 5Y*: -14.04%
• 10Y*: —

LAES

• 1D: 5.49%
• 1M: 25.43%
• YTD: -3.44%
• 6M: -28.15%
• 1Y: 3.40%
• 3Y*: -30.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEVA vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc.	83.73%	179.58%	25.38%	-29.19%
LAES SEALSQ Corp	-3.44%	-38.54%	380.47%	-94.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AEVA and LAES is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2023	0.27

Over the past year, AEVA and LAES have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS AEVA : -$2.52 LAES : -$0.43
PS Ratio AEVA : 67.11 LAES : 12.02
Total Revenue (TTM) AEVA : $20.97M LAES : $35.37M
Gross Profit (TTM) AEVA : $971.00K LAES : $13.21M
EBITDA (TTM) AEVA : $21.17M LAES : -$41.81M

Return for Risk

AEVA vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEVA

AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 50
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 45

LAES

LAES Risk / Return Rank: 46
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEVA vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AEVA	LAES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.03	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	0.95	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.10	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	0.05	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	0.08	+0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEVA vs. LAES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the LAES Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEVA and LAES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEVA	LAES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.03	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	-0.26	+0.15

Drawdowns

AEVA vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEVA drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEVA and LAES.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEVA	LAES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.71%	-98.44%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.68%	-72.68%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.68%	-98.07%	+22.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.60%	-83.39%	+7.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-84.70%	+14.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.80%	42.65%	+13.15%

Volatility

AEVA vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison

Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a higher volatility of 44.56% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 29.25%. This indicates that AEVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEVA	LAES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.56%	29.25%	+15.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.91%	65.70%	+17.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.13%	110.08%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.13%	170.34%	-73.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.37%	170.34%	-78.97%

Dividends

AEVA vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEVA nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEVA and LAES in my portfolio?

AEVA and LAES have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEVA or LAES?

AEVA has higher volatility (44.56%) compared to LAES (29.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEVA dropped -97.71% vs LAES's -98.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.