AEMS vs. WEEL
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and WEEL (Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WEEL.
Performance
AEMS vs. WEEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than WEEL's 5.68% return.
AEMS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEEL
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. WEEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 15.80% | 11.81% |
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF | 5.68% | 9.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMS and WEEL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. WEEL — Risk / Return Rank
AEMS
WEEL
AEMS vs. WEEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEMS | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 1.03 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. WEEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum WEEL drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and WEEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -17.45% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -1.45% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.95% | — |
Volatility
AEMS vs. WEEL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 7.98% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 12.83% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 12.83% | +3.28% |
AEMS vs. WEEL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. WEEL - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than WEEL's 12.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.51% | 7.53% | 0.00% |
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF | 12.41% | 12.72% | 6.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEMS and WEEL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEEL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEEL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.
WEEL has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 6.51% for AEMS.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Peerless ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for WEEL.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and WEEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer