PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. ZVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. ZVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -13.95% return, which is significantly lower than ZVRA's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has outperformed ZVRA with an annualized return of 11.46%, while ZVRA has yielded a comparatively lower -17.62% annualized return.


AEM

1D
-3.64%
1M
-6.19%
6M
-23.42%
YTD
-13.95%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
44.82%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
7.47%

ZVRA

1D
-1.35%
1M
-31.14%
6M
5.67%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
-14.40%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
-17.62%
ALL TIME*
-23.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$362.33M$376.74M$426.77M
$18.33M$18.68M$21.76M

AEM vs. ZVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-13.95%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
6.14%7.43%27.33%42.70%-47.30%-22.23%84.70%-78.71%-56.05%37.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and ZVRA is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$73.56B

ZVRA:

$562.18M

EPS

AEM:

$11.60

ZVRA:

$2.15

PE Ratio

AEM:

12.52

ZVRA:

4.43

PS Ratio

AEM:

5.06

ZVRA:

4.50

PB Ratio

AEM:

2.56

ZVRA:

2.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$14.43B

ZVRA:

$122.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$9.02B

ZVRA:

$104.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$10.36B

ZVRA:

$149.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. ZVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVRA
ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AEM vs. ZVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMZVRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.02

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.36

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

-0.65

+1.54

AEM vs. ZVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the ZVRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and ZVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. ZVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, smaller than the maximum ZVRA drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and ZVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMZVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-99.27%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.80%

-40.40%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.80%

-43.47%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-60.97%

+15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

-97.85%

+43.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.25%

-97.48%

+55.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.63%

-86.53%

+39.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.06%

22.22%

-2.16%

Volatility

AEM vs. ZVRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is 11.20%, while Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a volatility of 29.44%. This indicates that AEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMZVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.20%

29.44%

-18.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

49.17%

-13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.77%

65.35%

-20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.35%

61.11%

-23.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.38%

81.05%

-43.67%

Dividends

AEM vs. ZVRA - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while ZVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.17%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AEM vs. ZVRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Zevra Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and ZVRA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVRA has higher volatility (29.44%) compared to AEM (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs ZVRA's -99.27%.

AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and ZVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer