PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. SEZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 109.06% return.


AEM

1D
3.09%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
50.92%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
14.70%

SEZL

1D
3.00%
1M
29.59%
YTD
109.06%
6M
88.63%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.66%119.53%46.04%21.31%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
109.06%48.89%1,146.59%-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and SEZL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$81.60B

SEZL:

$4.64B

EPS

AEM:

$10.60

SEZL:

$4.15

PE Ratio

AEM:

15.35

SEZL:

32.00

PEG Ratio

AEM:

0.24

SEZL:

0.06

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.06

SEZL:

9.87

PB Ratio

AEM:

3.11

SEZL:

23.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$13.51B

SEZL:

$480.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$8.28B

SEZL:

$426.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$9.72B

SEZL:

$193.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMSEZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

-0.07

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

-0.10

+2.58

AEM vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and SEZL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMSEZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-89.95%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.39%

-72.02%

+32.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.35%

-27.15%

-8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-40.29%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.93%

53.61%

-39.68%

Volatility

AEM vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is 15.31%, while Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that AEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMSEZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.31%

17.41%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

62.20%

-26.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.06%

87.49%

-43.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.06%

204.57%

-167.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.35%

204.57%

-167.22%

Dividends

AEM vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AEM vs. SEZL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
135.54M
(AEM) Total Revenue
(SEZL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEM vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
66.4%
86.3%
Portfolio components
AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and SEZL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEZL has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to AEM (15.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and SEZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer