PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 35.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 14.70%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


AEM

1D
3.09%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
50.92%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
14.70%

RIO

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
35.32%
6M
43.14%
1Y
89.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.66%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
35.32%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and RIO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990

0.24

Over the past year, AEM and RIO have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$81.60B

RIO:

$172.61B

EPS

AEM:

$10.60

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

AEM:

15.35

RIO:

8.03

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.06

RIO:

1.55

PB Ratio

AEM:

3.11

RIO:

2.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$13.51B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$8.28B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$9.72B

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

5.89

-5.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

21.91

-19.43

AEM vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, roughly equal to the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-88.97%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.39%

-15.19%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

-24.19%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

-35.25%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

-37.47%

-16.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.35%

-5.97%

-29.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-23.76%

-22.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.93%

4.09%

+9.84%

Volatility

AEM vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a higher volatility of 15.31% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.81%. This indicates that AEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.31%

11.81%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

24.27%

+11.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.06%

29.32%

+14.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.06%

29.30%

+7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.35%

30.65%

+6.70%

Dividends

AEM vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RIO's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.82%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

AEM vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
30.65B
(AEM) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEM vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
66.4%
26.6%
Portfolio components
AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and RIO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEM has higher volatility (15.31%) compared to RIO (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer