PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. NGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AEM

1D
3.09%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
50.92%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
14.70%

NGD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.66%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
4.25%251.21%69.86%48.98%-34.67%-31.51%148.86%16.28%-77.00%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and NGD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.61

The correlation between AEM and NGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

AEM:

$10.60

NGD:

$1.61

PE Ratio

AEM:

15.35

NGD:

5.64

PEG Ratio

AEM:

0.24

NGD:

0.01

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.06

NGD:

3.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$13.51B

NGD:

$1.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$8.28B

NGD:

$758.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$9.72B

NGD:

$1.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NGD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMNGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

AEM vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMNGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.93%

Volatility

AEM vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMNGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.35%

Dividends

AEM vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while NGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AEM vs. NGD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and New Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
496.10M
(AEM) Total Revenue
(NGD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and NGD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and NGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer