PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGD vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NGD vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Gold Inc. (NGD) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NGD

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NEM

1D
-2.14%
1M
-3.43%
6M
-16.23%
YTD
-5.74%
1Y
51.31%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$671.95M$683.19M$803.32M

NGD vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NGD
New Gold Inc.
4.25%251.21%69.86%48.98%-34.67%-31.51%148.86%16.28%-77.00%-6.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-5.74%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NGD and NEM is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.58

The correlation between NGD and NEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

NGD:

$1.61

NEM:

$7.88

PE Ratio

NGD:

5.64

NEM:

11.89

PEG Ratio

NGD:

0.01

NEM:

0.31

PS Ratio

NGD:

3.30

NEM:

5.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

NGD:

$1.46B

NEM:

$19.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NGD:

$758.26M

NEM:

$10.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

NGD:

$1.19B

NEM:

$14.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGD vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NGD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NGD vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Gold Inc. (NGD) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NGDNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

NGD vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NGD vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGDNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.57%

Volatility

NGD vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGDNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.74%

Dividends

NGD vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

NGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.09%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NGD vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Gold Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NGD and NEM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGD and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer